Thursday, December 24, 2020

on the importance of Christmas

 

Religion will always fail. Religion is the attempt by man through his own prowess to reach God and no human however pious, however righteous, however charitable, or however zealous can hope to lift himself from the dust and achieve to the Heavens. Man like his forefather Cane may attempt to please God in accordance to his own wisdom, might even incorporate Christian symbolism into his attempt, but God can never accept the ungodliness of man no matter what religious trappings are associated with it. Man cannot reach God.

This is why the birth of Christ is so precious to believers. We may wrap it in ribbons and bows; accentuate it with lights and wreaths. We may celebrate with gifts and feasts, or we may reject all of that as commercialism and excess. We may choose to celebrate in the dark winter months or we may choose a different season as that most likely to mirror the historic date of Jesus birth, but the remembrance of that Holy event is pivotal to the Christian doctrine.

Because man could never reach God, God came to man. “In the beginning was the Word and the Word was God and the Word was with God, … and the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us and we beheld His glory the Glory of the only begotten of the Father full of grace and truth”.  The birth of Christ was more than the birth of a new teacher, or a great philosopher, it was the very incarnation of God. To be technically accurate Christ’s birth was not miraculous; it is in the conception of Christ where the great miracle lies, when the infinite and eternal God joined with the egg of a virgin maid to form a one cell embryo that was both completely God and wholly man.

Without the miraculous conception no sinless man could arise and without the sinless man no worthy sacrifice could be found to redeem the whole of humanity from the sinful and wretched state into which we are born. The manger makes possible the cross, the cross makes forgiveness possible. Because of the cross there can be an empty tomb and that empty tomb makes eternal life possible. Because He lives we can live also.

So rather you celebrate Christmas like most of us, or you observe the birth of Christ some different way, God Bless and may the light and the life Christ brought to the world live in your heart, God bless.

Saturday, October 17, 2020

Christians in Public Discourse

 

Often these days I have noticed a lot of misrepresentation of Christianity and the role of faith in public discourse, rather through ignorance or maliciousness these attacks create a very dangerous precedent. As a Christian who is also a patriot and involved in the political process I would like to address a few of those misrepresentations. The first falsehood being bandied about is that political conservatism and Bible Based Christianity are one and the same. Among protestant Christians there is no papal authority to determine doctrinal purity or to give authoritative guidance on matters of public debate. As a result there is in the protestant church a great deal of diversity of thought. (Unlike Joe Biden’s view of the black community) .   The Churches are organized according to their own designs and are free to interpret the Scripture according to their own conscience. I would point to two main philosophies in how to properly interpret the Bible. Accepting the Bible as absolute truth and interpreting the events of the day against its doctrines, or using the events of the day to determine how the Bible should be interpreted. . Churches in the latter group tend to lean more to a progressive view. Christians like me who are in the former category tend to lean to a politically conservative viewpoint, because at the heart of that philosophy of governance is a Judeo-Christian worldview.  Psalms tells us that God made us in the womb, the 10 commandments tell us that murder is wrong, Jesus  tells us it’s better to be drowned with a millstone upon our necks than to harm a child, for these reasons we are passionately prolife.  Many in the conservative right are not Christians, many are not religious though if pressed on a multiple choice survey they might check “Christian” as opposed to “Muslim” or “Atheist” but there are conservative atheists, conservative Muslims, gay conservatives, et.al. Conservatism is bound together by a broad commitment to a set of ideals not coerced fidelity to a strict but ever changing leftist dogma. The origin of conservatism is found in the great works of the enlightenment, in Burke and de Tocqueville, in Thomas Payne and Patrick Henry, expressed in the Declaration codified in the Constitution. It is a philosophy of the sovereignty of the individual and the idea of natural law, and natural rights assigned and assured by “Nature’s God”. Christians are drawn to conservatism because these ideals reflect the ideals of, in fact are directly descended from, our own reformation. Conservatism allows for the differences of the individual but maintains the core truth that there are moral absolutes undergirding the civilization. That brings me to the second misconception:  that Christians seek to enforce their beliefs through the power of the court or legislature.

                To be honest Christians learned the hard way that forced compliance is counterproductive in spreading the Gospel. Through the inquisition and religious wars of the Middle Ages the Church largely abandoned the Great Commission and instead used the name of Christ to further their own ambitions of political power. While shamefully Muslims Jews and Pagans were targeted the primary victims of this age’s abuses were Christians.  The one common thread of all these miscreant regimes was to keep the scriptures out of the hands of the people. Protestant and Catholic alike these pseudo religious tyrants knew that if God’s word was given to the congregation and they could disseminate it for themselves that the lies of the elite would be exposed. Our desire as a group is the preservation of the 1st amendment of the US constitution “Congress shall make no law regarding the establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” This is the reason for Christian Patriotism and it is very rare in the annuls of human history, that a people have been guaranteed by law to worship as they choose. Christians are zealous on this matter, we want no group to establish a particular denomination as a state church and we insist that the second half of that amendment be enforced. There is a rub here for us, as both Christians and conservatives do recognize the existence of natural law, we believe in morality, in the nuclear family, in private property rights, in the value of work, in honesty and integrity, and in self-reliance.  For the Christian to be self-reliant is to trust God in our day to day life. There is generally a libertarian view when it comes to how to relate to others, as a rule we do not seek to outlaw behavior we find immoral, unless it is also dangerous, we prefer to offer love and truth and lead sinners to salvation through word and deed, but we will not be compelled to accept behavior that violates our conscience.

                Finally there is the misconception that Christians do not want to help poor people, starving children etc. because we oppose socialism or out of control government welfare programs. This is not really a misconception it is an intentional misrepresentation dating back to the Great Society. The center of the community in the US, for social interaction, for Faith and learning and for help in the times of need has always been the religious institutions. In some communities that may be mosque or synagogue but in most of the country it is the church.  The equation of Christian charity with government welfare has been part of an insidious undermining of the American culture and the influence of faith and sadly many Christians have been duped. Let us judge these works by their fruit, where government programs have been most marshalled in the “war on poverty” has the poverty rate gone up or down? Are families stronger or weaker in those communities? Is crime higher or lower? Government assistance creates a permanent dependency that could be called a generational cycle of bondage, and we are lacking in compassion because we oppose this? Private charity is required to give account of how their funds are used but government programs including welfare are steeped in waste fraud and abuse to the point it is expected and accepted. If a private charity proprietor should embezzle a thousand dollars to buy his kid a birthday present he would face prosecution and jail. Government bureaucracy is somehow given a pass on the misappropriation of billions of dollars annually, yet we are told it is wise to entrust the helping of the needy to government.  Every church that I know of has a benevolence fund, and or a food bank. Many have clothing closets where clothes are either given away or sold for pennies. If I give my pastor a hundred dollars to anonymously help a struggling family in our church that family gets $100 of assistance. Add to this the Rescue Missions the Salvation Army, foreign missionaries many of whom are also health care workers, prison ministries, ministries to the children of prisoners, support for oppressed people and the persecuted church worldwide and the strong effort to make sure that persecution doesn’t come to our shores. Organizations like Samaritan’s Purse dedicated to easing poverty everywhere. These groups seldom make headlines but they make a difference, all without confiscatory taxation that stifles economic progress and suppresses the incentive of the citizen to work and achieve.

                I will never be ashamed of being a Christian, I will always be proud to stand for the flag and our founding principles as a conservative. The two are not the same thing but one clearly informs the other. God Bless.

                

               

Tuesday, August 11, 2020

If you don’t believe me look it up…

 

  

The CDC and OSHA have done studies that show cloth masks do not stop viruses.

Both the death toll and case numbers for Covid 19 are grossly exaggerated.

DRs Birx and Fauci have business ties to Bill Gates that easily constitute conflict of interest.

Money donated to BLM goes in part, to the democrat party.

Biden was opposed to banning travel from China before he was for it.

The fatality rate of Covid 19 is less than 1%.

Numerous health officials and labs have been caught purposefully inflating Covid numbers, none have been caught suppressing them.

Multiple studies show Hydroxychloroquine works when used properly to treat Covid 19.

Studies showing Hydroxychloroquine as being dangerous used toxic doses in late stage of disease without Zinc.

Policies requiring nursing homes to take Covid patients resulted in nearly half of Covid deaths.

Lockdowns are ineffective at slowing the spread.

Lockdowns are deadlier and more destructive than the virus.

The only state to reopen without phases was WI and they had no significant spike in cases or deaths.

States and countries that did not lock down fared better than ones that did but without the economic and social devastation.

There is considerable financial advantage to states for having more covid cases and for using ventilators.

The WV constitution forbids the suspension of constitutional rights even in time of war or crisis.

Reduced police prescence does not reduce crime.

Most black Americans do not want the police defunded.

Facebook fact checkers ore not impartial.

If you don’t believe me look it up…  but if you use Google it won’t be easy to find.

 

 

Saturday, August 8, 2020

mail in voting

 

I recently responded to someone’s post about 10 reasons to love mail in voting. I confess that the points listed were so absurd that I thought the post was a satire and I responded in kind only to discover that some people actually believe mail in voting was is the safest most secure way to hold and election and that anyone who opposes universal mail in voting WANTS Vladimir Putin to control the election because he apparently can sit in Moscow and control all in person voting machines like a video game console.

Sometimes it’s a challenge to argue common sense because when someone dismisses the obvious and argues from a standpoint of alternative reason how do you use logical arguments to counter?

How do you convince someone who believes sending a mail in ballot to everyone on the voter rolls guarantees that every person and only that person is assured of getting and returning that ballot? Do you point out that most states not only do not have clean voter rolls but have been blocked by mostly left wing activists from cleaning those rolls: people who have moved away still get ballots in the mail people who die still get ballots in the mail someone can fill those out and return them? There have been cases of ballots being taken from and filled out for residents of nursing homes and assisted care facilities and usually this is not done by agents of the Kremlin.

What do you say to someone who says lost or misdirected ballots is a non-issue because he says he has never sent or expected a package that was lost in the mail? The efficiency of the USPS aside this guy is either the luckiest guy ever or lives in fantasy land (or is telling a convenient fib). This is the guy who when you ask, “would you send large sums of cash by mail?” responds with “people send checks all the time”. it is difficult to debate across different planes of reality.

How do you answer when someone says in person voting is more susceptible to fraud than any other?  You walk in to the polls, in sane states show your ID than are handed a ballot or taken to a touchscreen you vote then you leave, the voting machines are never left unattended and the election officials inspect and verify each machine’s accuracy. Of course fraud is possible but in order to defraud the election someone has to have physical access to the machines. The ballots or counting cartridges have a chain of custody and in event of a challenge there is a backup copy, either in the form of ballots or paper printouts. Fraud is possible (Barak Obama’s margin of victory in some Philadelphia precincts exceeded the number of registered voters)  but the decentralized nature of the electoral process minimizes the damage a corrupt official can do. In fact widespread fraud is only obtainable in areas where one party rule has been in place for some time. When someone argues that voting by mail not only adequately replaces but even strengthens those safeguards despite the complete lack of verifiable custody chains from the time the ballot is mailed until it is returned?

How do you reason with someone who thinks Vladimir Putin has a button on his desk to control the US vote, even though even the vaunted Mueller investigation doesn’t allege that one vote was changed. Mueller’s gripe was that the Russians interfered by buying Face book ads not hacking voting machines. Voting machines are not networked and are not connected to the internet. One needs physical access to change the votes. I suppose that in the fictional USA of the left there may be millions of Manchurian Candidates that work as local election officials who at a phone call with a secret Russian phrase can spring into action and alter the votes in dozens of machines while the other folks take a coffee break, whose minds were programmed decades ago to vote Trump, but in the real world it’s not very likely.

Monday, July 27, 2020

...Even if There is a Virus

We are endowed by our Creator with certain inalienable rights and among these are life liberty and the pursuit of happiness… even if there is a virus

Our government was established to protect the individual from the overreach of government…. even if there is a virus

When power is divested to the individual he or she has the maximum opportunity to do good within his own circle but his or her ability to do harm to society as a whole is minimized… even if there is a virus

When power is centralized into the hands of a “mastermind” or other government agency the ability to make proper decisions for the individual is minimized but the ability to do great harm is maximized… even if there is a virus

All the way back to Biblical sources the economic bedrock to a free and sustainable economy is the protection of private property… even if there is a virus

Congress shall make no law regarding the establishment of religion nor prohibiting the free exercise thereof… even if there is a virus

Government’s power to help is extremely limited but its power to destroy boundless… even if there is a virus

The greatest threat to American freedom is a government that ignores the constitution (Jefferson) … even if there is a virus

Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free.(Reagan)…ESPECIALLY IF THERE IS A VIRUS.

Either Government of the people by the people and for the people is proper and right and should not be allowed to perish from this earth now when there is a pandemic, or it never is. Either we stand up and defend freedom now and that the best way forward is through the courage and ingenuity of the individual acting as his own sovereign making his own decisions based on his faith and instinct and the best knowledge he can acquire, or we should just forget the whole thing and declare Dr. Fauci Anthony the First ruler of all the land. If liberty is not right and proper now it never is.


Wednesday, July 22, 2020

Why I oppose the Mask Mandates as Christian

One question no one has asked me, but that I have asked myself should a Christian resist the mandate to wear a mask in public? It is accepted and correct doctrine that Christians should follow “every ordinance of man for the Lord’s sake” except where those laws compel us to violate the doctrines and commandments of Scripture. Since there is no 11th commandment specifying that Christians should not wear a mask then is it not reasonable to accept that mandate? If the Governor says that everyone should wear a funny hat and speak with a Scottish accent shouldn’t we obey that as well?

As an American It is easy to find sundry and compelling reasons to resist all forms of Government overreach but as strongly and as I stand to support the principles of American founding I kneel only at the Cross of Christ. I recognize as I review my Facebook postings and scroll through my on again off again blogging that I have spent more time and energy speaking to liberty and patriotic causes than speaking to spiritual matters but that is not because I value country above faith it is because I entered these mediums primarily to plead for what I perceive to be the nation’s best and founding principles.

I do not think I can lay out a case on this matter in a way that would sway theologians and scholars but I can lay out my heart.  I am not opposing wearing a mask; I am opposing mandating masks because it is a direct threat to religious liberty. Freedom of worship in the US is based on the basic idea of individual sovereignty. The entirety of our founding document is structured to define the limits of government and protect the rights of the individual. When the government infringes on any right it infringes on all rights, but this isn’t an intellectual or theoretical debate. For my own good the same governor using the same executive fiat has determined that I must wear a mask and has also decided that he has the right to decide if I can go to Church who I can sit with, how the order of worship is to be conducted and how sacraments are to be handled.  Other states are even worse than my own. I resist the mask mandate because it is part of the order attempting to control the Church.

I resist the mandate because it dehumanizes people. To compel an individual to behave in a manor contrary to their own perceived best interest is to make the individual subservient. The basic tenant of Christianity is that God made man a living breathing individual endowed with free will and that God so loved the individual human so greatly and so passionately that He preferred to send His only begotten Son to bring salvation to whosoever would receive this free gift. We cannot devalue the individual without devaluing the faith that gives the individual his or her value in the first place.

I reject mask mandates because they promote fear. It is necessary to create a panic in order to compel people to behave in a self-destructive manner and give up liberty. By rejecting the mask mandate I reject the destructive panic that is far more dangerous than Covid 19. I will probably address this more at a later time.

I do not believe that in any way civil disobedience should be the default position of any Christian, but in some cases it is essential. Was Rosa Parks right or wrong to refuse to move to the back of the bus? No specific commandment was violated by the law and the back of the bus goes to the same place as the front. I suspect some felt that she was in the wrong but the stand she took for the dignity of all individuals has proven to be right.  I believe rejecting the mask mandate will as well.


Sunday, July 12, 2020

Why I Support S Marshall Wison

First off let’s be clear S Marshall Wilson will not and cannot save West Virginia. I support him because he knows that is not the governor’s job in the first place.

Jim Justice wants to shelter and protect West Virginians, he wants to feed us and clothe us and keep anyone from ever getting sick. Marshall Wilson knows the difference between an elected public servant and a messiah.

 Jim Justice believes that by making a disaster declaration he has no limits to his power as long as it’s for the public good as designated by his office. S Marshall Wilson understands that the US and state constitutions exist to limit the power of government to specific enumerated powers that do not include ordering the worship services in individual churches, seizing the rights of individuals to govern the use of their own property and make  personal and intimate decisions about health on behalf of 1.7 million WV citizens.

Jim Justice believes that he alone has authority to make law and impose penalties and that executive orders have the full weight of law and therefore refuses to call the legislature into session to give the people’s representatives a voice in the state’s policies related to covid response, restrictions, and spending.  S Marshall Wilson respects the legislative process and understands the importance of oversight especially in a time of crisis.

Jim Justice wants absolute rule, he prefers a velvet glove but will readily use the iron fist if necessary.

S Marshall Wilson understands and believes that the purpose of government is as stated in the Declaration of Independence: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That, to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. 

Perhaps you live in a different state but I urge you judge what your governor has done during this pandemic and see how it measures up to the fundamental truth that the declaration states, if health and safety (ie the greater good) has supplanted the protection of inalienable rights as the primary function of government, you need a new governor as badly as WV does. 

Keep on the firing line.