Tuesday, April 30, 2013

Marriage Eden’s Legacy or Sodom’s curse part II- the threats to marriage and the civil Society


 
First a bit of light diversion from the great American philosopher Bill Watterson:


Funny and insightful and relevant to a point I wish to make. Before Dr. Laura Schlesinger went on satellite I was a fairly regular listener. Once she read an e-mail from a gay man concerning gay marriage. The e-mailer was countering the idea that gay marriage was a threat to the institution of marriage by pointing out the fact that heterosexual couples were already in the process of destroying marriage without any help from gays. (For the record Dr. Schlesinger does not support gay marriage or adoption but does not condemn the gay lifestyle.)

Last time we looked at gay marriage. We looked at forcing the nation to accept a morally deviant behavior as morally equivalent to marriage that God ordained and how doing so erodes the very foundations of a free society.  What I hope to do now is look at some of the greatest threats to the very institution of marriage and suggest how we might put our nation back on a path of cultural and moral stability.

Threat number 1- Loss of Sexual Purity.

This subject has two subcategories that need be addressed, Promiscuity, and abuse.  I am hesitant to include this link the video quite honestly is disturbing and disgusting but it is accurate and maybe it will shock you into seeing what your kids are being taught. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7XR9yH2ETk

Even if the curriculum your school is using isn’t so blatantly obscene as are these Planned Parenthood curriculums, the basic concept is the same. Moral absolutes, the concept that marriage is the only and proper place for the expression of sexuality, and the idea that boys with boys and girls with girls is not morally equivalent is verboten.  I cannot imagine how infuriated my sainted mother would have been if ever I had been exposed to the sex-ed of today. She once gave the Jefferson County School system quite a going over for having school on Good Friday, and she never asked if I could be excused from class she just told them her son would not be there. The problem runs very deep, and perhaps its most significant cause is that parents have come to believe that the government has moral authority over our children. Yet Chief Justice Burger Wrote concerning Griswold vs. the State of Connecticut, “The history and culture of Western civilization reflect a strong tradition of parental concern for the nurture and upbringing of their children. This primary role of the parents in the upbringing of their children is now established beyond debate as an enduring tradition 17 [emphasis supplied]”. Even if the Court gives in to the liberals, this right cannot be taken away, it is inalienable. Don’t misunderstand the government can declare itself superior to the parent, and persecute those who refuse to acquiesce, but God’s law falls to the side of the parent. At some future date we will discuss this at greater length but the point being, parents you have not only the right, but the obligation before God to insure that your children are taught the acceptable use and context for sex, and the sanctity of marriage. I recommend homeschooling, the government system is just too corrupt and too Godless at so many levels for our kids to be sent to. Unless of course you think it’s wise to teach your kids to swim by throwing them into shark infested water.   They might not drown and they might not get eaten, but the odds that they will hold to your beliefs drastically diminishes after 12 years of indoctrination.

The second factor that so drastically increases promiscuity is what New York Times columnist Pamela Paul has called the “pornification” of the culture. Sexual imagery is everywhere, the poster boards in the Target ladies underwear isle would have been resigned to a “girly” book when my dad was young. I am not only referring to the extreme examples, to the ready availability of pornography on the web, or the Oscar dresses made of a handkerchief and two posted notes, I am talking about the general comfort level with sex as commonplace. There is a spiritual element of sexuality, a value that exceeds its biological function. Something of it needs to be kept a “mystery”. Am I the only one who finds a romantic scene in a film so much more intriguing when the curtain is pulled and something is left to the imagination? There is little romance in two people throwing off clothing and slobbering on each other, or maybe that’s just me.  As long as sex is treated as just one more thing people do like brushing teeth or going to the movies, we will never return to a sane and healthy view of sexuality as a sacred part of marriage.

Finally, the devaluation of sex also devalues women.  A woman is a precious and valuable thing. A few proverbs on the subject: Proverbs 19:14 House and riches are the inheritance of fathers: and a prudent wife is from the LORD.

 Proverbs 18:22 Whoso findeth a wife findeth a good thing, and obtaineth favour of the LORD.

 Proverbs 31:10 Who can find a virtuous woman? for her price is far above rubies.

The sexual revolution (actually rebellion against the Lord) did not make women less of a sex object, it made them wholly that. Ideally a woman is to be sought and fought for, and wooed and won, treasured and protected, provided for and romanced, “as long as they both shall live.” In return for this giving of his life for her the woman offers to love and support her “prince” all the days of her life and only when he has made that sacred commitment is he worthy to receive the blessing of knowing her sexually. If she gives that away for less than a wedding ring (and the sincere commitment that accompanies it) she cheapens herself, but by withholding it she demonstrates her true worth. Laura Schlesinger once took a call from a woman who felt disrespected by her live in boyfriend Dr. Laura’s suggestion was to “make him leave 50$ on the dresser in the morning after you have sex, at least a prostitute places some value on herself. How is he going to respect you if you don’t respect yourself?” (Quoted from memory) I agree with the doctor.

The second layer of the loss of purity is more unseemly but must be addressed: sexual abuse. According to a CDC study as many as one in four college age girls have been raped, or someone has attempted to rape them.  Let’s deal with this but first it’s necessary to note that not all women are virtuous and there have been cases where men have been accused falsely by women looking for an upper hand in custody hearings or as some sort of revenge, so men, be careful who you are alone with. However the study in question was anonymous and no men were affected so we can assume these numbers are close.  The question of preventing sexual abuse is of paramount importance and its implications on marriage can hardly be overstated. First of all a woman once abused tends to struggle with issues of self-worth, and this leads often to promiscuity and other struggles with relating to a loving relationship. For woman, a level of caution is required, care with where she goes and who she goes with and how she behaves while she’s there. I think all girls should take self-defense courses.  Getting raped is never a woman’s fault, but a wise girl can lessen her danger considerably by being responsible.  With so many girls being hurt this way the grace and healing of the Lord are the first most important things. Then she will need a man to understand the trials she goes through as a result of her ordeal. It can be done, thank God!

 

We tend to look at Sodom and Gomorrah and see the homosexuality and relate it to the destruction of the cities, (GEN 9) after all we do call it “Sodomy”.  However though Homosexuality is a sin, I think the real evil in Sodom was the violent and abusive nature of the men. Not that the homosexual aspect isn’t of importance, the image we have been getting of the loving gay or lesbian couples just wanting to love each other is often false. Homosexuality is not a preordained condition; most men who identify as gay were victims of child sex abuse.  ( http://www.home60515.com/3.html ).  Gays tend to be violent, not all of course, but many are.  http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20America/Sodomy/homoviolence.htm  and http://chalcedon.edu/research/articles/gay-activists-threaten-violence/   America is desperately in danger of losing its very soul and the violent abusiveness of the culture is largely to blame.

Men are constantly bombarded with sexual images, violent porn is readily available, and there is a perverse mythos that women secretly want to be dominated. The curse of sin takes the natural desire to love and cherish and turns it on its ear and makes it a desire to own and dominate woman. No college professor would acknowledge that he condones rape, but when they teach the concept of moral relativism they do just that. If nothing is inherently wrong   on its own than the 35% of men who say that if they knew there would be no consequence would consider forcing a woman to have sex are not morally wrong. Not all men could be salvaged by moral absolutes but many could. For the rest we have law enforcement.

There is more to get to but given the length thus far we do that next time.

Until then keep on the firing line!

 

 

 

 

Tuesday, April 16, 2013

Marriage – Eden’s Legacy or Sodom’s Curse?


 

Gay marriage is a contradiction in terms. Marriage has been defined since the literal first moment of the existence of the two genders as the joining of a man and a woman.
23The man said,
“This is now bone of my bones,
And flesh of my flesh;
She shall be called Woman,
Because she was taken out of Man.”


24For this reason a man shall leave his father and his mother, and be joined to his wife; and they shall become one flesh (GEN 2:23, 24)

The debate over rather to allow homosexuals to marry is fundamental to the survival of the American way of life. We have come now to a place where good is called evil and evil good. (Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!)

First of all, Homosexuality is a deviant behavior. It is a sin before God. Scripture is clear on this matter. Both the old and new testaments proclaim this with no uncertainty or wiggle room for interpretation.  This question is a question of morality; are we a moral nation or a degenerate one? Do we accept morality as having certain absolute codes or is it strictly a question of relativity? Leaving aside for the moment the most important aspect of the morality debate, the judgment of God,  let us remember that without a moral underpinning a free society cannot stand. One of the great philosophers of the great enlightenment Baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu made the following observations on moral absolutes or to use his word virtue; “ There is no great share of probity necessary to support a monarchical or despotic government. The force of laws in one, and the prince's arm in the other, are sufficient to direct and maintain the whole. But in a popular state, one spring more is necessary, namely, virtue… When virtue is banished, ambition invades the minds of those who are disposed to receive it, and avarice possesses the whole community. The objects of their desires are changed; what they were fond of before has become indifferent; they were free while under the restraint of laws, but they would fain now be free to act against law; and as each citizen is like a slave who has run away from his master, that which was a maxim of equity he calls rigour; that which was a rule of action he styles constraint; and to precaution he gives the name of fear. Frugality, and not the thirst of gain, now passes for avarice. Formerly the wealth of individuals constituted the public treasure; but now this has become the patrimony of private persons. The members of the commonwealth riot on the public spoils, and its strength is only the power of a few, and the licence of many.”

The first argument that the gay rights activists will use is the claim that marriage is a right hence cannot be denied gay couples.  Never has “marriage” been an inalienable right. Federalism allows that the all matters not specifically enumerated in the constitution are relegated to the states. The states therefore have the right to choose whom they will and will not issue a marriage license to. 2012 saw the first electoral success for the gay rights lobbies and no conservatives are actively seeking to use the power of the judiciary to take away those state’s decisions. In Fact the “Defense of Marriage Act” (DOMA) was passed by a Republican house and signed by Democrat Bill Clinton with the expectation that some states would allow for gay marriage, and its key provision is to allow states the authority to recognize or not to recognize same sex unions from other states. Marriage is a spiritual institution and a cultural one that states recognize and encourage because it is beneficial, yes even essential, to society. States however did not invent marriage; they simply recognize “what God hath wrought”. Calling gay couples “spouses” does not make it so. A man cannot marry another man any more than he can marry a lamp post or a sports car. Marriage is what it is and not even the US Supreme Court can change that.

Don’t get me wrong, gays and lesbians have rights. They have the freedom to speak out on their beliefs, they have the right to keep and bear arms, they have the right of assembly and no one can take away their personal property without just compensation. They have the right to due process and they have the protection of the law against harm to their persons or possessions. They can engage in whatever deviant behaviors they wish in the privacy of their homes without the fear of unreasonable search and seizures.  They can find sympathetic clergy that will perform a ceremony over them; they can choose to live in the committed relationship they always talk about. They have no desire for liberty, what they want is for the rest of the country to be coerced or straight out forced to acknowledge their reprehensible arrangements as morally equal to “what God has joined together.”

Certain issues are presented by those who support gay marriage which should be addressed, such as death benefits or hospital visits, conservatism offers the solution without casting aside morals in a manner reminiscent of Sodom.  Federal regulations should allow for insurance companies to decide who they want to insure and who they do not. Some companies either for matters of principle or economics would love to extend their benefits to the “non-traditional” partners of potential customers while other providers would market to the more conservative consumers by only insuring traditional families. Likewise companies could determine rather to recognize common law arrangements, etc. the market is perfectly capable of dealing with these matters. Likewise anyone wanting to grant visitation to a partner other than a wife of children should merely have to go and have a paper drawn up in advance that says in event of my incapacitation I want the “so and so” to be allowed access  to visitation and to make decisions on my behalf. That simple, gays and lesbians can sin if they choose, live as free moral agents without using the heavy hand of judicial activism to force their conduct on the rest of us.

So you see my views, which are the Christian views, are not bigoted but they are principled. We don’t want to see gays and lesbians mistreated or punished, we do however want them to see the error of their ways and come in repentance to the Cross of the Lord for forgiveness and healing. We want them to bend the knee to God willingly, it is not the Christian, nor the conservative, way to force anyone to comply with our morals, and we simply ask the same respect in return.

The Gay Agenda is not the only threat to marriage. It may not be the most pressing, just the hottest topic. Next time we will look at the greater threats to marriage (AKA our civil society) then in the third part we will remind ourselves what marriage was meant to be!

Keep on the firing line.

PS our prayers go out to the people of Boston and the families who suffered loss or injury in yesterday’s terror attack. God bless you and bring justice to the evil bastards responsible.