Saturday, September 12, 2015

Trump: The Republican Version of Obama

Did that title get your attention? Trump supporters already mad? Let me develop my point then tell me where I am wrong.
I have been attempting to put my finger on the meteoric rise of the Trump campaign and it still somewhat eludes me. There is a boldness and audacity that is refreshing, he shrugs off political correctness and defies apology, these are all positives but not unique to Trump. Cruz has battled boldly against the Republican establishment, Walker turned blue Wisconsin around over the slings and arrows of the union attack dogs on their own turf. Want someone not in politics? Dr. Ben Carson looked Barak Obama right in the eye and challenged him on principle in front of the world. Contrast this to Trump’s spat with Fox reporter Meghan Kelly which consists mostly of snipes and insults on twitter and other media outlets and you see the difference between bravado and bravery.  Still, Trump’s voice has largely drowned out these other men, he is after all louder and he owns his own microphone, at first I thought this explained it.
If I am near a radio between noon and three eastern I usually have Rush Limbaugh on. Recently he had a caller who was a Trump supporter who was talking about Trump’s economic policy (or lack thereof) and she said (quoting from memory) “Donald doesn’t need to give specifics, he knows that if you cut taxes and get rid of all these regulations that the economy will fix itself,” to which the host replied, “You realize Trump hasn’t said any of this, you are inferring it.” The caller replied, “He doesn’t have to say it I know he believes it.”  “Hmmmm” I thought, “this is anecdotal but enlightening. What if Trump supporters are projecting their own beliefs on Trump, i.e. he’s rich therefore he believes in free enterprise.”
The next piece of the puzzle came a week later on the same program where guest host author Mark Stein said, “Donald Trump has stated many views over the years some of which were conservative but many were not. What Trump is is a business man who sees the Republican Party as a listless and leaderless business ripe for a hostile takeover” (Again quoted from memory). I jumped up like Charlie Brown and proclaimed “THAT’S IT” so loud I could have sent Lucy flying was she near. If Trump is treating this as a business venture, what business model is he using: the last successful campaign Barak Obama’s!
What did Obama do, what is Trump doing? Pick one or two issues that will excite the base (Obama had Iraq Trump has immigration) then avoid specifics on everything else. Think I am exaggerating? Go to Trump’s own website look under positions and nothing appears except immigration. Obama gave many flowery speeches and about hope and change but never defined the change, Trump says he wants to make America great again but gives no specifics as to how. Obama criticized Bush as a substitute for principled debate, Trump resorts to personal attacks rather than substantive debate in every case. Trump is not Obama, he adapts the model of the Obama Campaign not the style, Obama is a snarky elitist, Trump an egotistical blowhard but the end result is the same, both men would much rather destroy the competition than defend the merit of their ideas and positions.
Obama counted on his previous positions and statements to be largely ignored, aided by a long history of voting present in the Illinois legislature, Trump also expects that his previous positions on most things will be forgotten, as very little of what he believed in 2000 still applies today, he suspects that his lack of political experience will shelter him. To anyone willing to look however there is one telling truth that betrays all. Obama was willing to break away from his policy of never putting down a recorded position in Ill. To vote in favor of letting infants who survive late term abortions to be killed by a second doctor. This would have shown us how radical he really is, had we paid attention. Trump has one similar telltale sign as to what type of President he would be. He once supported spoke kindly of and donated to Hillary Clinton. He now condemns her as the worst Secretary of State in the country’s history but truth be told she hasn’t changed since the days of Trump’s admiring praise. Trump could like Bill and Hillary, could respect them, even befriend them, but donate to her campaign? Hillary was a radical leftist then she is a radical leftist now the difference? Supporting her was in Trump’s interest then, criticizing her is in his interest now. He had no principled opposition to her and her ideology, her lies about WMD’s her turning against our own troops in combat, her attempts to socialize medicine in the first assault that helped pave the way for Obama-care, her lack of ethics and profiteering at the expense of national security. Trump didn’t turn a blind eye, he actively supported it! Obama’s infanticide vote proved him a radical, Trump’s Hillary support shows him a self-serving pragmatist. Name one time where Trump has taken a principled stand on anything where it cost him money. Of course the answer thrown out is that’s how things are done in NY send Trump to Washington so he can change it. Really? Give him more power and he will suddenly grow a set of principles? Faithless in little faithful in much? I remember that quote a different way. Trump reminds me of the Groucho Marx  quote ““Those are my principles, and if you don't like them...well I have others.” 
If, God forbid, Trump becomes president, we know which way he will go if the good of the country comes up against the good of the Donald. Rush Limbaugh has recently been referring to the “conservative literary class who write about things but don’t do anything” as those who oppose Trump, well that isn’t me. I am just some dumb farmer in WV writing a little blog read by tens of people all over the world, but I know a huckster when I see one.
In years past having a complete lack of class would have disqualified a candidate from the Presidency of the US. What we learned in 2008 and 2012 is that a classless individual can not only be elected but reelected to that high office. Though in fairness Obama pretends to have class, most people not paying attention perceive him as a nice guy, heck Mitt Romney’s key campaign point seemed to be pointing out Obama was a nice guy. With Trump there is no pretense, he does not have any class at all and he doesn’t pretend to be a nice guy. This is a negative to old fuddy-duddies like me but in all honesty class would be an expendable trait in the right candidate with the right stands on key issues, though I cringe at the press release from the Trump white house on the day Angela Merkle the fiery prime minister of Germany refused to support an initiative of the Trump Administration: “no one takes Merkle seriously her face looks like it was hit by a VW and she has blood in her whatever, (according to Trump a polite term for a lady’s  nose) and besides Germans are stupid, that’s why they lose all those World Wars”. Tell me you can’t imagine Trump doing this? Is class expendable? Maybe in the right candidate but Mr. Trump ain’t 

No comments:

Post a Comment