Sunday, March 29, 2020

MAKING THE CURE WORSE THAN THE DISEASE


Do kids still read the Old Lady who swallowed a fly? When I was a kid I used to get my dear sainted mother to read that thing to me all the time. While it wasn’t my favorite, it couldn’t hold a candle to Rackety Boom or Bravest of All, it was always a good bedtime laugh. In the story the little old lady swallows a fly and in fear of the possibly mortal effects swallows progressively larger animals each as a cure for the other until she swallows a horse… she’s dead of course. I would love to send a copy to those folks in Washington DC and the various state capitals across the fruited plane because that silly rhyme is the closest example to the Covid 19 response I can think of.

Covid 19 or the Chinese Coronavirus is a serious thing and among vulnerable populations it can be deadly.  As of this writing 2,000 people have died and I would encourage prayer and support for the families of those victims, just as I would for the 24-64 thousand folks that influenza has claimed this year. Bottom line is we deal with the flu deaths every year despite having some highly touted and barely effective flu shot without crippling our economy and bankrupting our future.

Most states give governors power to take reasonable actions to deal with infectious disease, unfortunately the declaration of the state of emergencies has caused governors everywhere to suffer from the unfortunate delusion that they are Yul Brenner in the Ten Commandments as they decree “So Let it Be Written, So let it Be Done”   as they sign executive orders declaring who is essential and who is not. I can’t help but be reminded of Governor Kodos from the original Star Trek who ordered the deaths of nonessential colonists to save essential ones in a time of famine. Don’t laugh, these powers to temporarily shut down those businesses that Governor Ramses deems unworthy is exactly the power that the green new deal democrats want to have permanently, after all according to their experts global warming is far more dangerous than the Chinese coronavirus. Of course this temporary state of emergency isn’t the same as what the aforementioned Dems want but it is a huge step in that direction.

If our free election process survives, and I am certain it will, we the people must act to take back our liberties and seriously curtail the emergency powers we entrust our governors with. I do not doubt that the electoral process in our country will survive but it will not survive unscathed. The most sacred aspect of our democratic republic has also fallen under the whim of the Supreme Pharaohs of the several states, as 14 states have rescheduled their primaries based on Coronavirus fears, Alaska, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Wyoming and Puerto Rico.  The Governor of Ohio blatantly defied a court order forbidding him to do that very thing, imagine if Trump simply threw court orders out the window if he didn’t like their rulings? Surely I stipulate that these are primaries and are held at the discretion of parties and states, I am not suggesting that the President could use this as a justification to cancel national elections, but  it’s a big step in that direction.
We have already addressed the government hubris that defines the labeling of essential and nonessential businesses, but separately let’s address the asinine nature of these decisions. If you concede (and I do not) the authority of states to shutter private businesses at will it is impossible to justify the wisdom of the same. How does a bankrupting small business in Hiram Georgia stop the spread of infection in Manhattan? Perhaps these extreme measures are needed in hard hit areas but the strength of America in part is in our size and diversity. Droughts in the mid-west do not lead to famine because the same weather pattern may well produce a bumper crop in the Ohio Valley. New York City can be shut down by a terror attack but hundreds of other municipalities and cities can send resources to help them recover, the same is true of earthquakes in California, or floods in Tennessee. If we had a smart targeted response that allowed lightly affected and unaffected areas to continue to work and create wealth then the economic consequence would be minimized. Aid could be sent to places that need it, Americans would take care of Americans the way we do in every other crisis. Entrepreneurs would do what entrepreneurs do, they would find new ways to make money by fixing problems, rather motivated by altruistic or mercenary goals their solutions would be available. This is not to minimize what the private sector is doing in this crisis the advances in testing and treatment that have leapt from zero in just a few short weeks is phenomenal. Thankfully the President has resisted calls to nationalize industries and supply chains, and further tamp down the spirit of enterprise that will elevate us out of the dark times. Alas if we weren’t so dead set on crippling and destroying the economy and thus the ability of millions to contribute in big and small ways to abating the crisis what great things we could achieve!
Finally let’s remember that only about 10% of the crisis in this country is from the virus, 90% is the panic stricken responses. As we progressively swallow bigger and bigger animals to kill the fly we swallowed when we imported, through no fault of our own, this virus from China the horse that kills us may well be this relief effort passed by congress last week. 2.2 trillion dollars of new debt to do what churches (and oh do I have a lot to say about churches) and businesses should be doing without depleting the public treasury at all. It wasn’t enough to bankrupt our economy today; we need to pay for it by bankrupting our grandchildren and their children as well. Bernie Sanders couldn’t have imagined such an overwhelming victory over capitalism in his fondest dreams.
I heard President Trump say that it’s important to look at reopening the economy and assure that the cure isn’t worse than the disease, thank you Mr. President, better late than never.
Keep on the firing line.






Sunday, March 22, 2020

Covid 19 Necessary Response or Totalitarian Over Reach




Two articles have come to my attention today that sum up my fears over the Corona virus outbreak response the first from Judge Napolitano, with whom I often disagree, the second from the Heritage Foundation, with whom I generally agree. https://www.creators.com/read/judge-napolitano https://www.heritage.org/the-constitution/commentary/constitutional-guide-emergency-powers
Napolitano fears that the that the response threatens freedom over the long term and that the consequences of losing that freedom is far more dire than the threat a virus, even a horrific one, could impose. I agree. If inalienable rights can be alienated by a crisis, they cease to be rights but become license to be revoked as the government sees fit. These Napolitano thoughts could have been taken from my YouTube comments and texts, though my versions were notably less eloquent.

However when I did additional research via the Heritage Foundation I learned that infectious disease is treated differently by law then a standard crisis, in times of epidemic state local and federal laws allow for reasonable measures to be taken  where needed even if those measures may be extraordinary. They cite numerous cases and precedents which are legally binding even if I disagree with those cases and precedents.  

The totalitarian instincts of government are not confined to the malicious intents of would be petty dictators, rather we dare never forget that unshackled from the constitution as our government increasingly has become tyranny is not possible but inevitable.
To keep the forces of government under control it is important to recall that government derives its just power from the governed, and we the governed have been far too liberal in giving over those powers. Herein lies in my humble opinion the key, we have enabled our leadership to take reasonable steps in times of infectious disease epidemics. We the people must determine if the steps being taken are reasonable.

I am fairly comfortable that the federal response has been in accordance to statute, and in my opinion mostly correct, though I am unconvinced that the level is totally justified, state and local governments are the front line defenders of public health and we have entrusted them with very broad powers , but do we really want to grant governors the power to lock down entire states and shutter churches indefinitely?
It is time to define reasonable for the sake of public health emergencies. Once a power is abused it must be revoked, this applies to the FISA court and it applies to public health. When this crisis passes or if it goes on too long we the people need to reign in the reach of state and local governments, We the people need to define what the limits of state and local powers are with regard to religious institutions and private businesses we need to define the parameters of when these powers can be implemented and for how long.

I know we have to have flexibility on these matters epidemics don’t follow time tables but we are individuals and must be allowed to act and think as individuals, we need to be permitted to decide for ourselves how to best protect ourselves and our families.

After all we are Americans
Keep on the firing line